|
PREDICTION - EDG: Rise to your own challenge |
Magnitude: I wrote to EQF, first quoting his assertion: In Reply to: Your choice posted by EQF on August 07, 2004 at 00:25:22: "I understand that you and your colleagues are expecting an earthquake in the California area at some point in time. I probably have the only data which can tell you when it is likely to occur." (--EQF) EQF, you have made these two clear declarative statements in the post above. You now have a chance to bolster your reputation in seemingly the only forum worldwide that doesn't buy your ideas hook, line, and proverbial sinker. When will this earthquake (presumably the K-B prediction) take place? When is it "likely to occur?" Please don't refer me to your website. I'm not a scientist, and as such, cannot make any sense of it. Here and now you have the opportunity to save, presumably, more than one life. Thank you, Cathryn ********* I am adding a call for magnitude and location. (Since he claims to know.) So, three simple questions to prove to this board your methods work. When I asked him (below) why he was ignoring my questions, he wrote: "Cathryn, it is impossible to respond to or even read all of the notes that are being posted here." EQF, you have endless typing time to make claims you can't support, except for anyone who actually asks you to be specific about your predictions. You've made two statements, and if you're going to make them here, it's fair game that you fill in the blanks, not dodge the questions I asked by saying you're too busy. All I'm asking for is three words. Surely you aren't too busy for that. If so, I'll expect not to see you writing copious posts in the future. You said you know when the next catastrophic earthquake is about to hit CA. Let's hear the specifics, please. Where, when, and how big? Just three short answers, please. Respectfully, Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: EDG: Rise to your own challenge - EQF 15:47:35 - 8/12/2004 (22452) (1) ● Re: EDG: IF ANYONE DIES, IT'S YOUR FAULT - Petra 18:01:10 - 8/12/2004 (22455) (1) ● Canie - Cathryn 18:41:31 - 8/12/2004 (22457) (1) ● Re: Canie - Don in Hollister 19:06:41 - 8/12/2004 (22458) (2) ● Re: Canie - Petra 20:10:06 - 8/12/2004 (22461) (3) ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale 08:43:41 - 8/13/2004 (22468) (1) ● Ah The PNW - Petra 18:01:03 - 8/13/2004 (22474) (0) ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale 08:42:01 - 8/13/2004 (22467) (0) ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale 08:40:37 - 8/13/2004 (22466) (0) ● Re: Canie - Canie 20:04:18 - 8/12/2004 (22459) (3) ● Re: Canie - EQF 23:41:35 - 8/13/2004 (22483) (0) ● Re: Canie - Cathryn 17:53:10 - 8/13/2004 (22473) (0) ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter 11:30:35 - 8/13/2004 (22469) (1) ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn 17:38:46 - 8/13/2004 (22472) (1) ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter 18:23:15 - 8/13/2004 (22475) (2) ● Re: re: Canie - EQF 22:16:48 - 8/13/2004 (22481) (0) ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn 18:56:38 - 8/13/2004 (22478) (0) |
|