|
Re: EDG: Rise to your own challenge |
Cathryn, make sure you read my latest post titled “It Works” to get a better understanding of the type of data that my present forecasting program produces. It is easy to interpret statements in reports posted here in different ways. What I was saying regarding that possible approaching California earthquake is that if it is going to occur, it will probably appear in my data for the California area. And if the people expecting that earthquake don’t know how to interpret my data then they will probably miss the warning signs and the earthquake might occur without their ever being aware of its approach. I myself am busy getting the forecast technology running and am not closely watching any area for earthquakes. So I might miss the warning signs myself. Follow Ups: ● Re: EDG: IF ANYONE DIES, IT'S YOUR FAULT - Petra 18:01:10 - 8/12/2004 (22455) (1) ● Canie - Cathryn 18:41:31 - 8/12/2004 (22457) (1) ● Re: Canie - Don in Hollister 19:06:41 - 8/12/2004 (22458) (2) ● Re: Canie - Petra 20:10:06 - 8/12/2004 (22461) (3) ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale 08:43:41 - 8/13/2004 (22468) (1) ● Ah The PNW - Petra 18:01:03 - 8/13/2004 (22474) (0) ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale 08:42:01 - 8/13/2004 (22467) (0) ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale 08:40:37 - 8/13/2004 (22466) (0) ● Re: Canie - Canie 20:04:18 - 8/12/2004 (22459) (3) ● Re: Canie - EQF 23:41:35 - 8/13/2004 (22483) (0) ● Re: Canie - Cathryn 17:53:10 - 8/13/2004 (22473) (0) ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter 11:30:35 - 8/13/2004 (22469) (1) ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn 17:38:46 - 8/13/2004 (22472) (1) ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter 18:23:15 - 8/13/2004 (22475) (2) ● Re: re: Canie - EQF 22:16:48 - 8/13/2004 (22481) (0) ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn 18:56:38 - 8/13/2004 (22478) (0) |
|