Re: EDG: Rise to your own challenge
Posted by EQF on August 12, 2004 at 15:47:35:

Cathryn, make sure you read my latest post titled “It Works” to get a better understanding of the type of data that my present forecasting program produces.

It is easy to interpret statements in reports posted here in different ways. What I was saying regarding that possible approaching California earthquake is that if it is going to occur, it will probably appear in my data for the California area. And if the people expecting that earthquake don’t know how to interpret my data then they will probably miss the warning signs and the earthquake might occur without their ever being aware of its approach. I myself am busy getting the forecast technology running and am not closely watching any area for earthquakes. So I might miss the warning signs myself.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EDG: IF ANYONE DIES, IT'S YOUR FAULT - Petra  18:01:10 - 8/12/2004  (22455)  (1)
        ● Canie - Cathryn  18:41:31 - 8/12/2004  (22457)  (1)
           ● Re: Canie - Don in Hollister  19:06:41 - 8/12/2004  (22458)  (2)
              ● Re: Canie - Petra  20:10:06 - 8/12/2004  (22461)  (3)
                 ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale  08:43:41 - 8/13/2004  (22468)  (1)
                    ● Ah The PNW - Petra  18:01:03 - 8/13/2004  (22474)  (0)
                 ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale  08:42:01 - 8/13/2004  (22467)  (0)
                 ● I don't feel strongly on this issue - John Vidale  08:40:37 - 8/13/2004  (22466)  (0)
              ● Re: Canie - Canie  20:04:18 - 8/12/2004  (22459)  (3)
                 ● Re: Canie - EQF  23:41:35 - 8/13/2004  (22483)  (0)
                 ● Re: Canie - Cathryn  17:53:10 - 8/13/2004  (22473)  (0)
                 ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter  11:30:35 - 8/13/2004  (22469)  (1)
                    ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn  17:38:46 - 8/13/2004  (22472)  (1)
                       ● re: Canie - Roger Hunter  18:23:15 - 8/13/2004  (22475)  (2)
                          ● Re: re: Canie - EQF  22:16:48 - 8/13/2004  (22481)  (0)
                          ● Re: re: Canie - Cathryn  18:56:38 - 8/13/2004  (22478)  (0)