Chris, there's a problem
Posted by Roger Hunter on January 10, 2004 at 06:04:41:

I've been trying to evaluate Shan's predictions and the results are turning out very significant.

I did a plot of number of quakes per 1/10 unit of mag. and found that the databases are not linear )(semi-log plot) but change slope around 4.5.

This causes small quakes to be underestimated. And this is true of both NEIC and CNSS which is odd because CNSS has manymore small CA events listed.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Chris, there's a problem - chris in suburbia  14:04:27 - 1/10/2004  (21041)  (1)
        ● Re: Chris, there's a problem - Roger Hunter  14:42:08 - 1/10/2004  (21045)  (1)
           ● Shan's predictions - chris in suburbia  07:10:21 - 1/11/2004  (21056)  (1)
              ● Re: Shan's predictions - Roger Hunter  07:19:19 - 1/11/2004  (21057)  (0)
     ● Additional information requested - EQF  09:48:42 - 1/10/2004  (21033)  (1)
        ● Re: Additional information requested - Roger Hunter  10:57:58 - 1/10/2004  (21035)  (1)
           ● Re: Additional information requested - EQF  13:20:59 - 1/10/2004  (21039)  (1)
              ● Re: Additional information requested - Roger Hunter  14:02:43 - 1/10/2004  (21040)  (1)
                 ● Ok. That helps (NT) - EQF  14:22:02 - 1/10/2004  (21044)  (0)