Re: Chris, there's a problem
Posted by chris in suburbia on January 10, 2004 at 14:04:27:

Roger, I read the following post in this thread, but don't know what you mean by "...and the results are turning out very significant." That would be read by many that Shan is predicting earthquakes in a way that is significant. But, you early said he we doing the same as chance. Do you mean that the incompleteness of the catalogue below M4.5 is the significant thing? Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Chris, there's a problem - Roger Hunter  14:42:08 - 1/10/2004  (21045)  (1)
        ● Shan's predictions - chris in suburbia  07:10:21 - 1/11/2004  (21056)  (1)
           ● Re: Shan's predictions - Roger Hunter  07:19:19 - 1/11/2004  (21057)  (0)