|
Shan's evaluation |
Hi all; I finally finished evaluating Shan's 417 predictions from 2003. If I did everything correctly, his results are just chance. Anyone up to checking me? Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Shan's evaluation - EQF 23:30:32 - 1/4/2004 (20920) (1) ● Additional point - EQF 00:17:29 - 1/5/2004 (20921) (1) ● re: your contributions - Roger Hunter 05:14:37 - 1/5/2004 (20924) (2) ● Re: Note To Roger & Others - Petra 20:12:10 - 1/5/2004 (20949) (2) ● legislatures - chris in sububia 03:28:48 - 1/6/2004 (20955) (1) ● Re: legislatures - Canie 15:38:21 - 1/6/2004 (20966) (1) ● how I do it - chris in suburbia 03:30:12 - 1/7/2004 (20982) (1) ● Re: how I do it - Petra 03:54:17 - 1/7/2004 (20985) (0) ● Thank you Petra - Roger Hunter 20:55:54 - 1/5/2004 (20953) (0) ● Re: re: your contributions - EQF 08:49:27 - 1/5/2004 (20932) (1) ● Re: re: your contributions - Roger Hunter 09:35:02 - 1/5/2004 (20933) (1) ● Comment - Petra 17:59:35 - 1/5/2004 (20943) (1) ● 50 years? - chris in suburbia 18:53:39 - 1/5/2004 (20945) (1) ● Re: 50 years? - Petra 19:44:26 - 1/5/2004 (20948) (2) ● Re: 50 years? - Canie 15:34:45 - 1/6/2004 (20965) (1) ● Re: 50 years? Canie - Petra 18:39:30 - 1/6/2004 (20972) (0) ● Re: 50 years? - Don in Hollister 20:40:00 - 1/5/2004 (20952) (1) ● Re: 50 years? - chris in suburbia 03:50:11 - 1/6/2004 (20956) (1) ● Re: 50 years? - Don in Hollister 12:01:56 - 1/6/2004 (20960) (1) ● Re: 50 years? - chris in sububia 14:00:59 - 1/6/2004 (20962) (0) ● Re: Shan's evaluation Do tell - Petra Challus 15:55:36 - 1/4/2004 (20896) (1) ● Re: Shan's evaluation Do tell - Roger Hunter 17:09:01 - 1/4/2004 (20899) (3) ● Try again repeat - Roger Hunter 17:40:53 - 1/4/2004 (20905) (0) ● Try again. - Roger Hunter 17:37:00 - 1/4/2004 (20903) (0) ● Formatting problem fixed - Roger Hunter 17:31:17 - 1/4/2004 (20902) (1) ● Thank You Roger - Petra Challus 19:17:26 - 1/4/2004 (20912) (0) |
|