Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes
Posted by Roger Hunter on December 13, 2003 at 07:18:34:

Petra;

It's because the theory is wrong.

Or rather, the effect, if any, is only marginally significant.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - EQF  11:27:01 - 12/13/2003  (20417)  (1)
        ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - Roger Hunter  12:06:39 - 12/13/2003  (20418)  (2)
           ● feathers - chris in suburbia  06:09:02 - 12/14/2003  (20426)  (1)
              ● Re: feathers - Roger Hunter  07:18:45 - 12/14/2003  (20428)  (1)
                 ● Re: feathers - chris in suburbia  04:56:05 - 12/17/2003  (20465)  (1)
                    ● Re: feathers - Roger Hunter  08:09:39 - 12/17/2003  (20466)  (0)
           ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - EQF  13:02:29 - 12/13/2003  (20419)  (1)
              ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - Don in Hollister  13:49:33 - 12/13/2003  (20420)  (2)
                 ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - Petra  23:51:21 - 12/13/2003  (20423)  (1)
                    ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - Don in Hollister  04:19:13 - 12/14/2003  (20424)  (0)
                 ● Re: Curious Events - But No Quakes - EQF  14:59:50 - 12/13/2003  (20421)  (0)