|
water well level |
EQF, "And I believe that I now understand what the politics are which are controlling this particular situation. But I do not want to discuss what is taking place here in public." As usual, you bring up a topic, do not provide the specific mechanism Shan uses in prediction, then claim you do not want to discuss how this illustrates your main point. Water level in wells is not an obscure measurement. Just this Thursday, I watched a talk by a post-doc at Harvard who was studying the level of dozens of water wells at the time of a couple of M6.5 events in Iceland. The data did not warn of the coming quakes, they revealed the response of the ground to the strain of the earthquakes. I encourage you to post facts not innuendo. John Follow Ups: ● Re: water well level - EQF 11:35:15 - 5/10/2003 (18646) (1) ● points are being missed - John Vidale 12:58:33 - 5/10/2003 (18648) (2) ● Shan's method - Roger Hunter 12:52:24 - 5/11/2003 (18662) (2) ● a poor man's strainmeter? - John Vidale 08:58:04 - 5/12/2003 (18671) (2) ● Re: a poor man's strainmeter? - Roger Hunter 13:39:24 - 5/14/2003 (18701) (0) ● Re: a poor man's strainmeter? - EQF 16:46:14 - 5/12/2003 (18680) (0) ● Re: Shan's method - EQF 14:47:15 - 5/11/2003 (18665) (0) ● Re: points are being missed - EQF 14:11:24 - 5/10/2003 (18650) (0) |
|