Re: Earthquake forecasting and triggering research
Posted by EQF on March 06, 2003 at 18:38:50:

I believe that my data are showing that there is probably a good correlation between earthquake triggering times and phenomena or forces such as the acceleration of the Earth in space and rapid changes in that acceleration. This isn’t just chance. However, arguing about it does little good. As they say, “A picture is worth a thousand words.” And I am trying to prepare a picture for other researchers to study.

Something that I am concerned about is finding a place to store the file. If it is too large then both of my Web sites will stop running after a certain number of people examine it. It might have to be made available as a compressed file.


Follow Ups:
     ● good correlation? - John Vidale  19:08:01 - 3/6/2003  (18202)  (2)
        ● Re: good correlation? - EQF  12:54:37 - 3/7/2003  (18207)  (1)
           ● Re: Research Results - Earthquakes Not Influenced By Tides - John Vidale  14:20:41 - 3/7/2003  (18210)  (1)
              ● Re: Research Results - Earthquakes Not Influenced By Tides - EQF  18:55:02 - 3/7/2003  (18213)  (1)
                 ● Counting is a prerequisite for demonstrating - John Vidale  19:24:36 - 3/7/2003  (18216)  (1)
                    ● An earthquake triggering “expert” paradox - EQF  23:04:23 - 3/8/2003  (18231)  (0)
        ● Re: good correlation? - Don in Hollister  20:00:23 - 3/6/2003  (18203)  (2)
           ● Re: good correlation? - EQF  12:54:47 - 3/7/2003  (18208)  (1)
              ● Re: good correlation? - Don in Hollister  22:43:33 - 3/7/2003  (18220)  (1)
                 ● Re: good correlation? - EQF  22:17:46 - 3/8/2003  (18230)  (1)
                    ● Triggers - Roger Hunter  14:57:52 - 3/11/2003  (18252)  (0)
           ● sounds right - John Vidale  20:40:50 - 3/6/2003  (18204)  (1)
              ● Re: sounds right - Petra Challus  23:41:30 - 3/6/2003  (18205)  (1)
                 ● she must have meant on unknown fault - John Vidale  04:30:38 - 3/7/2003  (18206)  (3)
                    ● Re: she must have meant on unknown fault - chris in suburbia  20:33:25 - 3/7/2003  (18217)  (1)
                       ● offshore faults - John Vidale  07:41:39 - 3/8/2003  (18221)  (1)
                          ● Re: offshore faults - chris in suburbia  12:11:32 - 3/8/2003  (18225)  (1)
                             ● tsunami evidence - John Vidale  12:31:55 - 3/8/2003  (18226)  (2)
                                ● Re: tsunami evidence - chris in suburbia  06:47:56 - 3/9/2003  (18233)  (1)
                                   ● thanks for the info - John Vidale  09:00:35 - 3/9/2003  (18234)  (0)
                                ● Re: tsunami evidence - Canie  12:42:57 - 3/8/2003  (18227)  (0)
                    ● not my specialty, but - John Vidale  19:10:46 - 3/7/2003  (18215)  (0)
                    ● Re: she must have meant on unknown fault - Petra Challus  18:14:05 - 3/7/2003  (18211)  (1)
                       ● Re: she must have meant on unknown fault - chris in suburbia  20:40:38 - 3/7/2003  (18218)  (0)