Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates
Posted by Roger Hunter on September 30, 2002 at 15:38:54:

Petra;

The problem is largely financial liability.

If I own property in the are YOU say will be destroyed in a quake then my property value goes to zero, my insurance gets cancelled and I suffer a big loss.

Guess who gets sued as a result. YOU, that's who.

Especially if you're wrong.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus  18:20:04 - 9/30/2002  (16851)  (1)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  20:04:20 - 9/30/2002  (16852)  (3)
           ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus  21:18:28 - 9/30/2002  (16857)  (2)
              ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  07:55:29 - 10/1/2002  (16864)  (1)
                 ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Petra Challus  18:58:43 - 10/1/2002  (16868)  (1)
                    ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Mary C.  20:47:12 - 10/1/2002  (16869)  (0)
              ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:24:32 - 10/1/2002  (16860)  (0)
           ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  20:57:44 - 9/30/2002  (16856)  (2)
              ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:33:06 - 10/1/2002  (16861)  (1)
                 ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  05:53:33 - 10/1/2002  (16863)  (0)
              ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - About Parkfield - Petra Challus  22:24:17 - 9/30/2002  (16859)  (0)
           ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Don In Hollister  20:43:38 - 9/30/2002  (16855)  (1)
              ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:35:57 - 10/1/2002  (16862)  (0)