Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know
Posted by Roger Hunter on September 30, 2002 at 20:04:20:

Petra;

Your point is valid if and only if the predictor has a proven track record.

And that means he has to make enough predictions to be sure he's right before he goes public.

The hurricane situation works because we know it can be done within certain margins of success but the earthquake predictor has no such track record to support him.

Case in point, Iben Browning with his New Madrid prediction. He had good reason (he thought) for his prediction but he was wrong and bunches of money were spent on it before it was over.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus  21:18:28 - 9/30/2002  (16857)  (2)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  07:55:29 - 10/1/2002  (16864)  (1)
           ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Petra Challus  18:58:43 - 10/1/2002  (16868)  (1)
              ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Mary C.  20:47:12 - 10/1/2002  (16869)  (0)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:24:32 - 10/1/2002  (16860)  (0)
     ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  20:57:44 - 9/30/2002  (16856)  (2)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:33:06 - 10/1/2002  (16861)  (1)
           ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  05:53:33 - 10/1/2002  (16863)  (0)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - About Parkfield - Petra Challus  22:24:17 - 9/30/2002  (16859)  (0)
     ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Don In Hollister  20:43:38 - 9/30/2002  (16855)  (1)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:35:57 - 10/1/2002  (16862)  (0)