|
Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit |
Having little or no idea about prediction, I might not add much here. However, in monitoring the other boards (i.e. syzygyjob), there are several sensitives and scientific predictors that have given about the same window for like activity. Interestingly, most of the avid predictors have been making a Southern California-Northern California connection. I agree with Todd - your predictions have been typically conservative . . . and accurate. Accordingly, we should be paying attention. (Just for the sake of "tear and compare," see http:///www.syzygyjob.net - prediction board, postings 5889, 5793, 5890, 5891 and 5913.) BTW - it appears that everyone is having some trouble nailing California down. Actually, your has been the most accurate set of predictions of which I'm aware. In my humble opinion . . . Tony Follow Ups: ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Lowell 01:47:51 - 4/16/2002 (14926) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - chris in suburbia 04:31:48 - 4/16/2002 (14927) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Lowell 08:47:00 - 4/16/2002 (14928) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Mary C. 09:23:21 - 4/16/2002 (14929) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Lowell 10:33:45 - 4/16/2002 (14930) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Mary C. 13:30:05 - 4/16/2002 (14935) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Lowell 15:01:10 - 4/16/2002 (14937) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Roger Hunter 15:23:54 - 4/16/2002 (14939) (1) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Mary C. 16:38:01 - 4/16/2002 (14942) (2) ● Re: Bay Area Earthquake Advisory (6.0+) - Others follow suit - Canie 23:42:37 - 4/16/2002 (14956) (0) ● It was just an observation . . . . - Tony 20:39:19 - 4/16/2002 (14948) (0) |
|