Re: Reasonable limits
Posted by michael on April 04, 2002 at 16:28:35:

Hi Roger:

That is exactly what I was trying to deal with when I proposed my 'scoring' proposal a while back. A prediction for a 3.0 should have very different limits than that of a prediction of an 8.0. That was the whole idea of the concept I proposed.......

maybe you might want to take a look at that idea again in light of your current concerns .... See message 5373. I'm not saying the numbers I posted should be used, I just posted them as an example of the overall idea of the scrogin method...

Michael


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter  16:54:04 - 4/4/2002  (14606)  (2)
        ● Re: Reasonable limits - 2cents  17:43:15 - 4/5/2002  (14666)  (1)
           ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter  17:57:37 - 4/5/2002  (14668)  (0)
        ● Re: Reasonable limits - michael  17:12:44 - 4/4/2002  (14608)  (1)
           ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter  18:10:51 - 4/4/2002  (14613)  (1)
              ● Re: Reasonable limits - Cathryn  19:18:42 - 4/4/2002  (14619)  (1)
                 ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter  05:49:53 - 4/5/2002  (14634)  (1)
                    ● Re: Reasonable limits - Mary C.  09:00:44 - 4/5/2002  (14638)  (1)
                       ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter  10:29:32 - 4/5/2002  (14641)  (1)
                          ● Re: Reasonable limits - Cathryn  20:55:51 - 4/5/2002  (14672)  (1)
                             ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter  04:41:04 - 4/6/2002  (14679)  (0)