|
Re: Reasonable limits |
Hi Roger: That is exactly what I was trying to deal with when I proposed my 'scoring' proposal a while back. A prediction for a 3.0 should have very different limits than that of a prediction of an 8.0. That was the whole idea of the concept I proposed....... maybe you might want to take a look at that idea again in light of your current concerns .... See message 5373. I'm not saying the numbers I posted should be used, I just posted them as an example of the overall idea of the scrogin method... Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter 16:54:04 - 4/4/2002 (14606) (2) ● Re: Reasonable limits - 2cents 17:43:15 - 4/5/2002 (14666) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter 17:57:37 - 4/5/2002 (14668) (0) ● Re: Reasonable limits - michael 17:12:44 - 4/4/2002 (14608) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter 18:10:51 - 4/4/2002 (14613) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Cathryn 19:18:42 - 4/4/2002 (14619) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter 05:49:53 - 4/5/2002 (14634) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Mary C. 09:00:44 - 4/5/2002 (14638) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter 10:29:32 - 4/5/2002 (14641) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Cathryn 20:55:51 - 4/5/2002 (14672) (1) ● Re: Reasonable limits - Roger Hunter 04:41:04 - 4/6/2002 (14679) (0) |
|