Response to EQF below
Posted by Cathryn on March 17, 2002 at 01:53:15:

I have been so busy with real life that I am pages behind on this board. Nevertheless, I have written a response to EQF regarding the forecasting debate.

It is far down on this page, so, as others have done in the past, I am posting an announcement here at the top so that others who are interested may reference it is there. Not that my opinion is all that important... but I have finally, after months if not years, come to a hard conclusion.

Cathryn


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Response to EQF below - Cathryn  01:56:34 - 3/17/2002  (13816)  (1)
        ● Re: Response to EQF below - EQF  07:08:42 - 3/17/2002  (13818)  (2)
           ● Re: Response to EQF below - Petra Challus  10:24:49 - 3/17/2002  (13821)  (1)
              ● Re: Response to EQF below - Scorpio  12:10:18 - 3/17/2002  (13825)  (0)
           ● Re: Response to EQF below - Nancy  09:27:24 - 3/17/2002  (13819)  (1)
              ● Re: Response to EQF below - Lowell  09:39:56 - 3/17/2002  (13820)  (1)
                 ● Re: Response to EQF below - Nancy  12:08:52 - 3/17/2002  (13824)  (2)
                    ● Re: Response to EQF below - Don in Hollister  12:38:43 - 3/17/2002  (13828)  (0)
                    ● Re: Response to EQF below - Lowell  12:28:01 - 3/17/2002  (13827)  (0)