|
Response to EQF below |
I have been so busy with real life that I am pages behind on this board. Nevertheless, I have written a response to EQF regarding the forecasting debate. It is far down on this page, so, as others have done in the past, I am posting an announcement here at the top so that others who are interested may reference it is there. Not that my opinion is all that important... but I have finally, after months if not years, come to a hard conclusion. Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: Response to EQF below - Cathryn 01:56:34 - 3/17/2002 (13816) (1) ● Re: Response to EQF below - EQF 07:08:42 - 3/17/2002 (13818) (2) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Petra Challus 10:24:49 - 3/17/2002 (13821) (1) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Scorpio 12:10:18 - 3/17/2002 (13825) (0) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Nancy 09:27:24 - 3/17/2002 (13819) (1) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Lowell 09:39:56 - 3/17/2002 (13820) (1) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Nancy 12:08:52 - 3/17/2002 (13824) (2) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Don in Hollister 12:38:43 - 3/17/2002 (13828) (0) ● Re: Response to EQF below - Lowell 12:28:01 - 3/17/2002 (13827) (0) |
|