|
Re: Jones probability revisited |
So then, all we need do is compute the Jones probability on a real data set just once. Makes sense. Easy enough. Be right back... Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Skywise 23:19:03 - 10/10/2013 (101035) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Roger Hunter 23:33:13 - 10/10/2013 (101036) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Skywise 23:50:23 - 10/10/2013 (101037) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Roger Hunter 23:57:52 - 10/10/2013 (101038) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Skywise 01:14:29 - 10/11/2013 (101039) (2) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Skywise 16:12:09 - 10/11/2013 (101042) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Skywise 17:16:18 - 10/11/2013 (101043) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Roger Hunter 18:12:29 - 10/11/2013 (101044) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Skywise 18:29:46 - 10/11/2013 (101045) (1) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Roger Hunter 18:40:24 - 10/11/2013 (101046) (0) ● Re: Jones probability revisited - Roger Hunter 11:04:02 - 10/11/2013 (101040) (0) |
|