|
Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms |
Being open to new and different theories regarding earthquakes and the possible triggering actions, please follow up on your statement regarding "showing why it is extremely unlikely that proton storms could have a significant effect on earthquakes" as you have postulated. The theory that proton storms can effect earth's geomagnetic field and likewise effect the possible seismic activity seems plausible to a layperson such as myself. Please provide evidence or dare I say speculation as to why this theory is not plausible. Follow Ups: ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - Lowell 20:42:18 - 10/5/2001 (9785) (2) ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - dib 06:04:10 - 10/6/2001 (9789) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Jen 06:53:58 - 10/6/2001 (9792) (2) ● The Only good science is PC science - Lowell 10:28:39 - 10/6/2001 (9794) (1) ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - dib 16:39:16 - 10/6/2001 (9802) (2) ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - Cathryn 17:55:08 - 10/6/2001 (9806) (1) ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - dib 19:02:27 - 10/6/2001 (9808) (2) ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - Cathryn 10:56:34 - 10/7/2001 (9815) (0) ● Hats off to Cathryn - Jen 19:38:10 - 10/6/2001 (9809) (1) ● Re: Hats off to Cathryn - Cathryn 11:01:32 - 10/7/2001 (9816) (0) ● Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - 2cents 17:51:54 - 10/6/2001 (9805) (2) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib 23:32:47 - 10/6/2001 (9812) (2) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - 2cents 06:22:42 - 10/8/2001 (9829) (2) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - Cathryn 16:38:39 - 10/10/2001 (9899) (1) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib 17:53:42 - 10/10/2001 (9900) (0) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib 22:15:57 - 10/9/2001 (9875) (0) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - Cathryn 11:21:06 - 10/7/2001 (9818) (1) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib 22:32:26 - 10/9/2001 (9877) (0) ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - Cathryn 18:04:54 - 10/6/2001 (9807) (0) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 08:58:52 - 10/6/2001 (9793) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Jen 11:10:32 - 10/6/2001 (9795) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 17:28:38 - 10/6/2001 (9804) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Canie 09:03:33 - 10/7/2001 (9813) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 09:43:58 - 10/7/2001 (9814) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn 11:04:48 - 10/7/2001 (9817) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 22:19:00 - 10/9/2001 (9876) (2) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 21:16:08 - 10/10/2001 (9914) (0) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn 16:32:54 - 10/10/2001 (9898) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 18:50:50 - 10/10/2001 (9905) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn 19:35:08 - 10/10/2001 (9906) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 20:27:20 - 10/10/2001 (9909) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn 20:52:15 - 10/10/2001 (9910) (0) ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - Lowell 21:20:48 - 10/5/2001 (9786) (2) ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - dib 06:26:14 - 10/6/2001 (9791) (0) ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - EQ-Forecasting 22:50:37 - 10/5/2001 (9788) (1) ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - Jen 06:19:25 - 10/6/2001 (9790) (1) ● DITTO ! (NT) - Cathryn 16:40:19 - 10/6/2001 (9803) (0) |
|