|
Re: Good science versus ??? |
My dearest Dawn: >Don in Hollister is an imposter that you should Or something... Actually, he's quite a nice guy. >Those earthquakes he is predicting are bogus. Hmm. Is that why they happen sometime just hours after he predicts them? >He's found some way of hacking the USGS database, >I'm sure of it. Ah. So he's manipulating data, now, huh? Sounds suspiciously like something out of a HITCHCOCK movie (if you get my drift). Shock and alarm! (How does she know?) >Don't invite him to any more Actually, I won't. At least not until he invites me to one. Reciprocity and all that. >And since you mention it, 17 years don't mean a Yes, dearest, I imagine they come not too infrequently. I've known my husband for 33 years. Does that somehow trump your years of wedded bliss? >Your man is a lucky guy, IMHO. At last! An opinion with which I can wholly concur. :-) Sweet dreams, Dearest Dib. Katharynne Follow Ups: ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib 20:27:20 - 10/10/2001 (9909) (1) ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn 20:52:15 - 10/10/2001 (9910) (0) |
|