|
Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 |
Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7,2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5 This is now probably be one of the highest accuracy and most timely earthquake forecasts in my collection. 2012/12/07 08:48:15 37.85N 143.58E 35 5.5 209km ESE of Ishinomaki, Japan On December 5, 2012 a formal Earthquake Advisory for the Japan area was sent to Japan government offices and Japan researchers and quite a few other earthquake researchers around the world including several EarthWaves board posters. It advised them to check their data to see if they could spot anything significant approaching for the Japan area. I thought that one like that might be as low as 5.5 for an earthquake close to the surface and perhaps 7.5 if deep in the crust. And those were pretty deep. Some of that information was contained in the following EarthWaves post. However, in that post I did not state that the advisory was for Japan as I did in my E-mail advisory. Instead, using a more cautious approach to keep people in that area from getting upset I pointed to Western Pacific Ocean areas. http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/80688.html The following chart showd a sharp line peak group around 140 E. And other EM Signals also indicated that it might be a Japan area earthquake. Many, many Japan government officials and researchers were warned plus the EarthWaves board visitors. And Japan officials can’t say that someone didn’t tell them that one was on the way. These are personal opinions. Follow Ups: ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Shan 22:58:04 - 12/8/2012 (80744) (1) ● Some Comments – December 9, 2012 - EQF 09:06:27 - 12/9/2012 (80746) (2) ● Thanks...where is the next..? - Shan 09:29:06 - 12/10/2012 (80752) (1) ● Here it is....... - Shan 10:56:30 - 12/10/2012 (80753) (0) ● Re: Some Comments – December 9, 2012 - Roger Hunter 10:02:27 - 12/9/2012 (80747) (1) ● in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - John Vidale 10:19:28 - 12/9/2012 (80748) (1) ● Re: in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - Roger Hunter 10:46:22 - 12/9/2012 (80749) (1) ● Re: in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - Island Chris 06:22:48 - 12/10/2012 (80750) (1) ● Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF 00:25:52 - 12/11/2012 (80757) (2) ● EQF in a nutshell - John Vidale 10:06:17 - 12/11/2012 (80760) (0) ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Roger Hunter 08:15:11 - 12/11/2012 (80759) (2) ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Island Chris 06:52:51 - 12/12/2012 (80768) (1) ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF 01:13:05 - 12/13/2012 (80774) (0) ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF 03:39:43 - 12/12/2012 (80766) (0) ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Roger Hunter 14:56:49 - 12/7/2012 (80740) (1) ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - EQF 18:12:13 - 12/7/2012 (80741) (1) ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Roger Hunter 18:31:21 - 12/7/2012 (80742) (0) ● Re: Japan Earthquake Predicted – Today’s Posting December 7, 2012 – Original Predictions on December 1 and 5, 2012 - Roger Hunter 14:56:21 - 12/7/2012 (80739) (0) |
|