Roger, I don't think you gave details of the prediction that EQF circulated. I'm only interested in what you received before the quake.

John, welcome back, but we could also really use some science posts. Tell us what you and your students are doing. Did you hear anything interesting at AGU? Can you link an abstract or two? I don't read the seismological literature except when I have to, I did not go to AGU this year, and Roger does not have access to the literature and seems mostly interested in evaluating predictions (which is valuable). For example, what is with the M7.3 Japan quake? USGS said "reverse" but it seems more likely to me that the 10 deg dip left lateral mechanism is the correct one.

Chris