Re: Some Comments – December 9, 2012
Posted by Roger Hunter on December 09, 2012 at 10:02:27:

EQF;

Your need for secrecy destroys any chance of credibility you might have.

We have here a post from an unnamed individual talking about unknown information from other unknown individuals which supposedly supports a forecast made before a particular quake.

Only the last item can be verified. Such a report was indeed circulated.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - John Vidale  10:19:28 - 12/9/2012  (80748)  (1)
        ● Re: in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - Roger Hunter  10:46:22 - 12/9/2012  (80749)  (1)
           ● Re: in case anyone is tempted to take EQF seriously - Island Chris  06:22:48 - 12/10/2012  (80750)  (1)
              ● Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  00:25:52 - 12/11/2012  (80757)  (2)
                 ● EQF in a nutshell - John Vidale  10:06:17 - 12/11/2012  (80760)  (0)
                 ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Roger Hunter  08:15:11 - 12/11/2012  (80759)  (2)
                    ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - Island Chris  06:52:51 - 12/12/2012  (80768)  (1)
                       ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  01:13:05 - 12/13/2012  (80774)  (0)
                    ● Re: Question– December 11, 2012 - EQF  03:39:43 - 12/12/2012  (80766)  (0)