A simple test
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 10, 2011 at 12:19:42:

EQF;

Your approach has been to determine which quakes have corresponded to particular sun-moon angles calculated from the time your signals are detected in an effort to determine where the next quake might happen.

But it seems to me that a first step would be to compare your signal times to quakes to see if there IS any correspondence.

Unless you can show that there is such a correspondence, what you've been doing is a waste of time.

So do you have a chronological list of signal date/times? If so, I can easily make the test.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: A simple test - EQF  19:46:51 - 6/10/2011  (78920)  (2)
        ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter  21:28:58 - 6/10/2011  (78922)  (1)
           ● Re: A simple test - EQF  23:53:29 - 6/10/2011  (78924)  (1)
              ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter  07:52:16 - 6/11/2011  (78925)  (1)
                 ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter  10:29:26 - 6/11/2011  (78926)  (1)
                    ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter  15:29:55 - 6/11/2011  (78927)  (1)
                       ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter  16:29:09 - 6/11/2011  (78928)  (2)
                          ● Re: A simple test; results - Canie  12:49:18 - 6/12/2011  (78930)  (2)
                             ● Forecasting Dangers – June 15, 2011 - EQF  23:37:14 - 6/14/2011  (78935)  (2)
                                ● not really - John Vidale  13:56:59 - 6/15/2011  (78937)  (0)
                                ● Earthquake Location Information – June 15, 2011 - EQF  23:50:46 - 6/14/2011  (78936)  (0)
                             ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter  21:17:01 - 6/12/2011  (78931)  (0)
                          ● Re: A simple test; results; caveat - Roger Hunter  16:40:51 - 6/11/2011  (78929)  (0)
        ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter  21:28:39 - 6/10/2011  (78921)  (1)
           ● Re: sorry, duplicate. - Roger Hunter  21:30:10 - 6/10/2011  (78923)  (0)