|
A simple test |
EQF; Your approach has been to determine which quakes have corresponded to particular sun-moon angles calculated from the time your signals are detected in an effort to determine where the next quake might happen. But it seems to me that a first step would be to compare your signal times to quakes to see if there IS any correspondence. Unless you can show that there is such a correspondence, what you've been doing is a waste of time. So do you have a chronological list of signal date/times? If so, I can easily make the test. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: A simple test - EQF 19:46:51 - 6/10/2011 (78920) (2) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 21:28:58 - 6/10/2011 (78922) (1) ● Re: A simple test - EQF 23:53:29 - 6/10/2011 (78924) (1) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 07:52:16 - 6/11/2011 (78925) (1) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 10:29:26 - 6/11/2011 (78926) (1) ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter 15:29:55 - 6/11/2011 (78927) (1) ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter 16:29:09 - 6/11/2011 (78928) (2) ● Re: A simple test; results - Canie 12:49:18 - 6/12/2011 (78930) (2) ● Forecasting Dangers – June 15, 2011 - EQF 23:37:14 - 6/14/2011 (78935) (2) ● not really - John Vidale 13:56:59 - 6/15/2011 (78937) (0) ● Earthquake Location Information – June 15, 2011 - EQF 23:50:46 - 6/14/2011 (78936) (0) ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter 21:17:01 - 6/12/2011 (78931) (0) ● Re: A simple test; results; caveat - Roger Hunter 16:40:51 - 6/11/2011 (78929) (0) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 21:28:39 - 6/10/2011 (78921) (1) ● Re: sorry, duplicate. - Roger Hunter 21:30:10 - 6/10/2011 (78923) (0) |
|