Re: A simple test
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 11, 2011 at 10:29:26:

EQF;

I used your file to compile a list of dates and times for the signals in the file and added the quakes in the time period.

Unfortunately, there were only 47 signals listed which is pretty small for the time period covered.

All I can say from visual examination is that for every signal there will be a quake following if you wait long enough. But that would be true of any day chosen at random too and means nothing.

It would help if there was a size specified, 7 or larger for example.

It would also help if a day range was specified, within 10 days for example.

But there isn't.

So even a simple test is impossible with such limited information.

Sorry.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter  15:29:55 - 6/11/2011  (78927)  (1)
        ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter  16:29:09 - 6/11/2011  (78928)  (2)
           ● Re: A simple test; results - Canie  12:49:18 - 6/12/2011  (78930)  (2)
              ● Forecasting Dangers – June 15, 2011 - EQF  23:37:14 - 6/14/2011  (78935)  (2)
                 ● not really - John Vidale  13:56:59 - 6/15/2011  (78937)  (0)
                 ● Earthquake Location Information – June 15, 2011 - EQF  23:50:46 - 6/14/2011  (78936)  (0)
              ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter  21:17:01 - 6/12/2011  (78931)  (0)
           ● Re: A simple test; results; caveat - Roger Hunter  16:40:51 - 6/11/2011  (78929)  (0)