|
Re: A simple test |
The signal – earthquake correlation is likely too complex for whatever test you are considering. Remember, my own computer programs are using complex probability equations to compare signals and earthquakes. So what you would likely be doing is conducting probability tests on other probability tests. As I have said, if you are going to try to generate “expert” level comments on this forecasting program then you need to try to first determine how it works. A list of some strong EM Signal times and earthquakes that followed has been available at my Web site since the last major Etdprog.exe program update. And that was a good part of a year ago. The times are in the Datatest.dat file that you could have easily downloaded at any time. I will send you an E-mail copy anyway. The actual Datatext.dat file that I use for earthquake forecasts has records for more than 3000 EM Signal times. For certain reasons that I don’t want to discuss in a public forum, that large file is never circulated. Finally, as I said in the past, I am still trying to get some important local matters settled. And that is requiring much of my time and effort. That situation will continue for perhaps another week or two. I am trying to stay current with Earthquake Warnings. But finding time to answer questions etc. can be difficult or impossible. Follow Ups: ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 21:28:58 - 6/10/2011 (78922) (1) ● Re: A simple test - EQF 23:53:29 - 6/10/2011 (78924) (1) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 07:52:16 - 6/11/2011 (78925) (1) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 10:29:26 - 6/11/2011 (78926) (1) ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter 15:29:55 - 6/11/2011 (78927) (1) ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter 16:29:09 - 6/11/2011 (78928) (2) ● Re: A simple test; results - Canie 12:49:18 - 6/12/2011 (78930) (2) ● Forecasting Dangers – June 15, 2011 - EQF 23:37:14 - 6/14/2011 (78935) (2) ● not really - John Vidale 13:56:59 - 6/15/2011 (78937) (0) ● Earthquake Location Information – June 15, 2011 - EQF 23:50:46 - 6/14/2011 (78936) (0) ● Re: A simple test; results - Roger Hunter 21:17:01 - 6/12/2011 (78931) (0) ● Re: A simple test; results; caveat - Roger Hunter 16:40:51 - 6/11/2011 (78929) (0) ● Re: A simple test - Roger Hunter 21:28:39 - 6/10/2011 (78921) (1) ● Re: sorry, duplicate. - Roger Hunter 21:30:10 - 6/10/2011 (78923) (0) |
|