the video forgot some details
Posted by John Vidale on April 07, 2009 at 09:02:10:

such as that the prediction had long expired when the earthquake struck, that the prediction was for a town 30 miles away that suffered almost no damage, and that no magnitude was specified.

Also that the radon methodology has been extensively tested and found ineffective.

Follow Ups:
     ● A sense of direction - EQF  09:55:38 - 4/7/2009  (75092)  (1)
        ● Computer languages project - EQF  22:13:14 - 4/8/2009  (75100)  (1)
           ● Re: Computer languages project - Skywise  20:58:50 - 4/9/2009  (75110)  (2)
              ● Re: Computer languages project - EQF  03:41:47 - 4/10/2009  (75114)  (2)
                 ● Re: Computer languages project - Skywise  13:54:16 - 4/10/2009  (75121)  (0)
                 ● 3 questions - John Vidale  06:56:34 - 4/10/2009  (75115)  (1)
                    ● Projects - EQF  09:16:14 - 4/10/2009  (75117)  (2)
                       ● Re: Projects - Skywise  14:04:53 - 4/10/2009  (75122)  (1)
                          ● Re: Projects - mrrabbit  15:32:18 - 4/10/2009  (75124)  (0)
                       ● typical - John Vidale  09:28:50 - 4/10/2009  (75118)  (0)
              ● Re: Computer languages project - Roger Hunter  21:50:46 - 4/9/2009  (75112)  (1)
                 ● Re: Computer languages project - Skywise  23:58:01 - 4/9/2009  (75113)  (1)
                    ● Re: Computer languages project - Roger Hunter  08:03:17 - 4/10/2009  (75116)  (1)
                       ● Re: Computer languages project - Skywise  13:52:27 - 4/10/2009  (75120)  (1)
                          ● Re: Computer languages project - Roger Hunter  14:48:49 - 4/10/2009  (75123)  (1)
                             ● Re: Computer languages project - Skywise   16:32:11 - 4/10/2009  (75125)  (1)
                                ● Re: Computer languages project - Roger Hunter  16:36:52 - 4/10/2009  (75126)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Computer languages project - Skywise  18:36:31 - 4/10/2009  (75127)  (0)