|
Re: 2.0 on top of Shasta |
Penny...if magma is moving there would be many tell-tale (tail?) quakes. If really a shallow M2 near the mountain, it is liable to be just related to stress...just the topography is liable to drive a quake or 3 (gravitational potential energy is, I think, the buzz-phrase). I would think there would be some local seismometers and at least survey-mode GPS. They can also do INSAR (?)....repeat satellite imaging of mountain and comparison (I forget if this is radar or visible or what)...and this normally shows clearly if a volcano is inflating...although someone has to do the work...and the snow may be a problem for this in winter and early spring. Follow Ups: ● Re: 2.0 on top of Shasta - PennyB 21:22:04 - 12/29/2007 (73086) (1) ● Re: 2.0 on top of Shasta - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 21:31:12 - 12/29/2007 (73088) (1) ● Re: 2.0 on top of Shasta - PennyB 12:56:30 - 12/30/2007 (73092) (1) ● volcano on TV - heartland chris 17:22:36 - 12/31/2007 (73095) (1) ● Re: volcano on TV - PennyB 12:51:47 - 1/1/2008 (73101) (1) ● volcanos - heartland chris 15:15:21 - 1/1/2008 (73102) (1) ● Re: volcanos - PennyB 22:28:36 - 1/1/2008 (73103) (0) |
|