first post was right
Posted by John Vidale on August 24, 2007 at 09:02:26:

I was asking about the quake pairs that constitute the anomalous populations in your binning results. So the events over 1000 km distance at times less than an hour are exactly the ones of interest.

They are the one that should appear at a long-term average rate if no earthquake triggering were happening, so they provide the best clue whether there is more triggering than expected, or if some already-well-understood process has crept into your analysis.

I haven't had a chance to look at them yet.


Follow Ups:
     ● what's anomalous? - John Vidale  09:10:36 - 8/27/2007  (72525)  (1)
        ● Re: what's anomalous? - Roger Hunter  13:37:38 - 8/27/2007  (72527)  (1)
           ● LESS clustering - John Vidale  15:21:35 - 8/27/2007  (72528)  (1)
              ● Re: LESS clustering - Roger Hunter  19:22:28 - 8/27/2007  (72529)  (1)
                 ● diminishing samples - John Vidale  20:44:07 - 8/27/2007  (72530)  (0)