|
first post was right |
I was asking about the quake pairs that constitute the anomalous populations in your binning results. So the events over 1000 km distance at times less than an hour are exactly the ones of interest. They are the one that should appear at a long-term average rate if no earthquake triggering were happening, so they provide the best clue whether there is more triggering than expected, or if some already-well-understood process has crept into your analysis. I haven't had a chance to look at them yet. Follow Ups: ● what's anomalous? - John Vidale 09:10:36 - 8/27/2007 (72525) (1) ● Re: what's anomalous? - Roger Hunter 13:37:38 - 8/27/2007 (72527) (1) ● LESS clustering - John Vidale 15:21:35 - 8/27/2007 (72528) (1) ● Re: LESS clustering - Roger Hunter 19:22:28 - 8/27/2007 (72529) (1) ● diminishing samples - John Vidale 20:44:07 - 8/27/2007 (72530) (0) |
|