Re: what's anomalous?
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 27, 2007 at 13:37:38:

John;

Here's what I got:


Number of quakes: 3153
Probability: 0.254


Observed Expected Chi-sq.


0 623.000 800.532 39.371
1 464.000 597.281 69.112
2 356.000 445.634 87.141
3 281.000 332.490 95.114
4 258.000 248.072 95.512
5 198.000 185.088 96.413
6 175.000 138.095 106.275
7 131.000 103.033 113.867
8 108.000 76.873 126.470
9 104.000 57.356 164.403
10 84.000 42.793 204.082
11 76.000 31.928 264.916
12 51.000 23.822 295.923
13 39.000 17.774 321.273
14 30.000 13.261 342.403
15 36.000 9.894 411.284
16 35.000 7.382 514.610
17 17.000 5.508 538.590
18 15.000 4.109 567.452
19 12.000 3.066 593.485
20 11.000 2.288 626.667
21 7.000 1.707 643.083
22 5.000 1.273 653.989
23 4.000 .950 663.779
24 6.000 .709 703.272
25 2.000 .529 707.364
26 4.000 .395 740.305
27 3.000 .294 765.167
28 .000 .220 765.387
29 .000 .164 765.551
30 4.000 .122 888.516
31 .000 .091 888.607
32 1.000 .068 901.366
33 3.000 .051 1072.620
34 1.000 .038 1097.048
35 .000 .028 1097.076
36 2.000 .021 1282.720
37 3.000 .016 1848.575
38 .000 .012 1848.587
39 .000 .009 1848.596
40 .000 .007 1848.602
41 .000 .005 1848.607
42 .000 .004 1848.611
43 .000 .003 1848.614
44 1.000 .002 2340.282
45 1.000 .002 2999.942
46 1.000 .001 3884.760

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● LESS clustering - John Vidale  15:21:35 - 8/27/2007  (72528)  (1)
        ● Re: LESS clustering - Roger Hunter  19:22:28 - 8/27/2007  (72529)  (1)
           ● diminishing samples - John Vidale  20:44:07 - 8/27/2007  (72530)  (0)