|
|
|
|
| Re: exaggerated claims about EQ predictions |
Yeah - I had more than a few qualms about the reported results from NASA. They were kinda working out of grade, anyway. What's up with that? Can you post whatever portion of the article you have that tells you it "refutes claims by NASA of great success . . ." (abstract, conclusion, summary or reference to it in another source)? Thanks for the heads-up, Chris. Michael Williams Follow Ups: ● a summary - John Vidale 18:26:22 - 1/24/2007 (62387) (1) ● Re: a summary - Cathryn 00:59:39 - 1/25/2007 (62393) (1) ● re: a summary - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 07:11:47 - 1/25/2007 (62398) (1) ● Re: re: a summary - Dennis Glasby 12:19:02 - 1/25/2007 (62401) (2) ● Re: re: a summary - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 06:20:29 - 1/26/2007 (62413) (1) ● M8 and MSc...John V? - heartland chris 08:37:05 - 1/27/2007 (62427) (3) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 07:28:50 - 1/28/2007 (62446) (0) ● sorry, touchy subject - John Vidale 19:22:02 - 1/27/2007 (62437) (1) ● Re: sorry, touchy subject - Cathryn 19:38:51 - 1/27/2007 (62438) (1) ● it's a theory - John Vidale 19:47:13 - 1/27/2007 (62439) (0) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - Roger Hunter 14:14:49 - 1/27/2007 (62432) (1) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - Skywise 20:28:50 - 1/27/2007 (62442) (1) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 07:17:23 - 1/28/2007 (62445) (2) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - Skywise 17:08:06 - 1/28/2007 (62452) (0) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - heartland chris 07:37:14 - 1/28/2007 (62447) (1) ● Re: M8 and MSc...John V? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 17:31:35 - 1/28/2007 (62453) (0) ● iceland - heartland chris 06:04:01 - 1/26/2007 (62412) (0) |
|
|
|
|
