|
|
|
|
| Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! |
Roger and Michael: Since it seems futile to debate the credibility of your probability calculation, I'll leave you guys alone. Several questions have been left unanswered and no attempt has been made to correct the flaws. Don't forget the column that shows how useless it is for people to make predictions. Follow Ups: ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - michael 15:26:25 - 3/20/2001 (6204) (0) ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - Roger Hunter 15:19:34 - 3/20/2001 (6202) (1) ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - David 17:54:08 - 3/20/2001 (6211) (2) ● Chance - michael 09:05:22 - 3/21/2001 (6241) (2) ● Re: Chance - David 02:54:00 - 3/22/2001 (6272) (1) ● Re: Chance - michael 14:58:27 - 3/22/2001 (6288) (2) ● Re: Chance - David 17:14:07 - 3/22/2001 (6300) (0) ● quality - Dennis 15:19:59 - 3/22/2001 (6291) (0) ● Re: Chance - David 14:18:16 - 3/21/2001 (6254) (2) ● Re: Chance - michael 17:11:46 - 3/21/2001 (6264) (1) ● Re: Chance - David 23:15:40 - 3/21/2001 (6270) (1) ● Quality - michael 15:08:15 - 3/22/2001 (6289) (1) ● subjectivity - Dennis 15:22:25 - 3/22/2001 (6292) (0) ● Re: Chance - Roger Hunter 15:20:38 - 3/21/2001 (6259) (1) ● Re: Chance - David 02:49:42 - 3/22/2001 (6271) (0) ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - Roger Hunter 18:14:23 - 3/20/2001 (6212) (2) ● Re: Who's upset? - David 14:35:14 - 3/21/2001 (6255) (0) ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - David 20:32:58 - 3/20/2001 (6219) (1) ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - Roger Hunter 05:44:53 - 3/21/2001 (6236) (1) ● Re: Prediction Status Table - With Tame Colors and Probabilities ! - David 06:29:53 - 3/21/2001 (6238) (0) |
|
|
|
|
