|
Re: Question is... Tahoe -Mike |
Yes, my prediction was "unedited" and for Tahoe. Read the earthquake book I wrote. Page 217-219. The hit was also covered in newspapers and magazines. Blame it on my cat. But no way can I convince you that animals or I can sense oncoming quakes. So it's not worth the time or typing effort. I know what I've done, and it's more than coincidence because I have countless hits, again and again--not post-predicted or "edited." Follow Ups: ● Re: Question is... Tahoe -Mike - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 06:43:39 - 11/12/2006 (60103) (1) ● Tahoe Seismicity Link Here - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 06:45:42 - 11/12/2006 (60104) (1) ● Re: Tahoe Seismicity Link Here--Mike - Cal 10:00:10 - 11/12/2006 (60106) (1) ● Re: Tahoe Seismicity Link Here--Mike - Skywise 20:50:08 - 11/12/2006 (60121) (1) ● no evidence I could find - John Vidale 23:18:43 - 11/12/2006 (60122) (3) ● Re: no evidence I could findJohn - cal 09:57:10 - 11/13/2006 (60142) (1) ● Re: no evidence I could findJohn - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 10:45:54 - 11/13/2006 (60144) (1) ● Re: no evidence I could findJohn - Skywise 16:01:33 - 11/13/2006 (60156) (1) ● Re: no evidence I could findJohn - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 17:33:55 - 11/13/2006 (60157) (1) ● Re: no evidence I could findJohn - Roger Hunter 17:52:02 - 11/13/2006 (60162) (1) ● Re: no evidence I could findJohn - Skywise 18:40:04 - 11/13/2006 (60164) (1) ● keep it here - heartland chris 06:49:12 - 11/14/2006 (60203) (0) ● Re: no evidence I could find--John - Cal 09:45:44 - 11/13/2006 (60133) (1) ● I found that article, too - John Vidale 18:45:28 - 11/13/2006 (60165) (0) ● 1975China - heartland chris 06:39:21 - 11/13/2006 (60129) (1) ● good article this year on 1975 quake - John Vidale 08:40:25 - 11/13/2006 (60132) (1) ● Re: good article this year on 1975 - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 10:31:21 - 11/13/2006 (60143) (1) ● their summary, not mine - John Vidale 19:16:33 - 11/13/2006 (60172) (0) |
|