Re: Comments
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 13, 2001 at 16:15:37:

That's not the way it works.

To do that I would have to do a probability analysis of all likely locations to see which one had the highest probability. But even when I found it, the probability would not be very high, so it wouldn't be useful as a prediction tool.

What it IS used for is to say "This person has beaten odds of 0.25 four times in a row" or whatever. It's to determine reliability, to say someone is better than chance.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Comments - David  18:04:07 - 3/13/2001  (5997)  (1)
        ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  19:47:41 - 3/13/2001  (5998)  (1)
           ● Re: Comments - David  23:43:42 - 3/13/2001  (6002)  (1)
              ● Re: Comments - David  23:58:09 - 3/13/2001  (6003)  (1)
                 ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  16:22:19 - 3/14/2001  (6007)  (1)
                    ● Re: Comments - David  02:39:05 - 3/15/2001  (6009)  (1)
                       ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  05:31:38 - 3/15/2001  (6011)  (1)
                          ● Re: Comments - David  06:52:52 - 3/15/2001  (6012)  (0)