|
|
|
|
| Re: Canadian Conspiracy-doubtful |
I have found that there usually is no conspiracy to be found. Maybe you've been listening to Dex too much? The other thing to keep in mind is to watch which magnitude scale is being used - ML,mb, ms, mw, etc - they can be different. - Also the candian list I've found does say PRELIMINARY and it may be changed. They are all listed there. What is this 200km west of Pt. Hardy anyway? A submerged volcano or something? It sure seems to be quite active an area. My guess is that it is so far offshore they just don't have enough info on the quake - no conspiracy. Canie Follow Ups: ● Re: Canadian Conspiracy-confirmed! - martin@n.i.c.e. 11:17:05 - 1/31/2001 (4834) (2) ● Re: Canadian Conspiracy-confirmed! - Canie 14:02:50 - 1/31/2001 (4845) (0) ● Re: Canadian Conspiracy-confirmed! Is it? - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 13:10:46 - 1/31/2001 (4841) (2) ● Re: Canadian Conspiracy-confirmed! Is it? - martin@n.i.c.e. 15:18:57 - 1/31/2001 (4848) (1) ● did you notice - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 16:11:34 - 1/31/2001 (4849) (2) ● Re: What is Early Juncture of the "Game"? - martin@n.i.c.e. 13:52:01 - 2/1/2001 (4861) (1) ● They're still getting facts together - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 14:41:54 - 2/1/2001 (4868) (1) ● Re:getting facts together - martin@n.i.c.e. 19:02:39 - 2/1/2001 (4886) (1) ● Re:getting facts together - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 09:53:04 - 2/2/2001 (4904) (0) ● Uhhhh...notice - Bob Shannon 18:31:42 - 1/31/2001 (4850) (1) ● Re: Uhhhh...notice - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 20:03:08 - 1/31/2001 (4851) (0) ● Re: Canadian Conspiracy-confirmed! Is it? - Don in Hollister 13:14:02 - 1/31/2001 (4842) (1) ● sorry :-) (nt) - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 15:18:07 - 1/31/2001 (4847) (0) ● Re: Canadian Conspiracy-SLOW - Bob Shannon 06:39:55 - 1/31/2001 (4819) (0) |
|
|
|
|
