Re: M5.2 south of border
Posted by Canie on May 24, 2006 at 08:58:46:

Yes Chris! We were sleeping!

I think the 5.2 was initially listed as a 2.9 or something.. or not listed at all before we got to bed..But another person with a seismograph thought the quake was more like a 4.9 than a 3.9 that was showing up on the lists at the right time..

Glad to see he wasn't a bit crazy, but I agree - this is an extention of the same general tectonic setting.

Canie

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: M5.2 south of border-foreshock - chris in suburbia  09:31:19 - 5/24/2006  (37272)  (1)
        ● Re: M5.4 is normal slip (stretching) - chris in suburbia  14:26:05 - 5/24/2006  (37307)  (1)
           ● Re: M5.4 is normal slip (stretching) - Glen  00:08:26 - 5/25/2006  (37329)  (2)
              ● Cerro Prieto - chris in suburbia  04:51:36 - 5/25/2006  (37339)  (0)
              ● Addendum - Glen  04:30:11 - 5/25/2006  (37337)  (0)