|
Re: FFA map for 7.7? |
Hi Chris, The map originated from Don over on Earthboppin. I am not sure of the source, so I will not post it, unless given permission. The study I am suggesting for Juan De Fuca has to do with P-103 rings lining up in parallel with known active fault/subduction zones. Because it is a small sample of the P-103 rings created by global 7+ quakes, it would initially not carry any weight in the scientific community. I am more interested in coming up with an accepted formula or means by which to study the situation. I just want to take a small piece of the globe and see what happens. The paralellism concept is also from Don, based on his many years of study. I will spend some serious time on it, if it has promise. The "iron is hot". glen Follow Ups: ● Re: FFA map for 7.7? - Don in Hollister 18:33:03 - 1/27/2006 (33218) (1) ● Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 20:39:31 - 1/27/2006 (33222) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - chris in suburbia 05:22:05 - 1/28/2006 (33225) (2) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 16:58:19 - 1/29/2006 (33253) (0) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn 14:50:11 - 1/29/2006 (33250) (2) ● Thanks Cathryn. n/t - Roger Hunter 18:59:59 - 1/29/2006 (33257) (0) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 17:03:54 - 1/29/2006 (33254) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn 18:05:09 - 1/29/2006 (33255) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley 07:54:22 - 1/31/2006 (33271) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn 14:18:11 - 1/31/2006 (33274) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley 16:30:41 - 1/31/2006 (33301) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 19:27:48 - 1/31/2006 (33302) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley 07:57:48 - 2/1/2006 (33307) (1) ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen 15:05:29 - 2/1/2006 (33311) (0) |
|