Ring Map>P-102 to 106
Posted by glen on January 27, 2006 at 20:39:31:

Fully Appreciated Don ****

I guess the first thing to do is make sure that others would agree that the ring zone is parallel with the general directional trend of the Juan De Fuca/Cascadia subduction zone. I have looked closely at the theoretical P-103 from the USGS, and I see that the map (from Don) is highly indicative of the directionality and distance from the landmarks given. It is a good map.

If that is agreed upon, then I must fix the lat-lons of a study area. In my mind a study area can be a large areal, with sub-regionality used to further constrain findings due to cross faulting and historical depth of seismicity.

Comments Appreciated, and thanx again Don.
glen



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - chris in suburbia  05:22:05 - 1/28/2006  (33225)  (2)
        ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  16:58:19 - 1/29/2006  (33253)  (0)
        ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  14:50:11 - 1/29/2006  (33250)  (2)
           ● Thanks Cathryn. n/t - Roger Hunter  18:59:59 - 1/29/2006  (33257)  (0)
           ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  17:03:54 - 1/29/2006  (33254)  (1)
              ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  18:05:09 - 1/29/2006  (33255)  (1)
                 ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  07:54:22 - 1/31/2006  (33271)  (1)
                    ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  14:18:11 - 1/31/2006  (33274)  (1)
                       ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  16:30:41 - 1/31/2006  (33301)  (1)
                          ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  19:27:48 - 1/31/2006  (33302)  (1)
                             ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  07:57:48 - 2/1/2006  (33307)  (1)
                                ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  15:05:29 - 2/1/2006  (33311)  (0)