Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106
Posted by Cathryn on January 29, 2006 at 14:50:11:

Thanks to you and Roger for looking at this. I always found the ring maps interesting, but it is just as interesting to note you have analyzed them and found them not to be predictors.

I really like having scientists on this board. Keeps us all grounded. On some of the other boards, it seems like any old theory is taken as a given, no matter how absurd. Thanks for being here. Roger, that goes for you, too.

Cathryn


Follow Ups:
     ● Thanks Cathryn. n/t - Roger Hunter  18:59:59 - 1/29/2006  (33257)  (0)
     ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  17:03:54 - 1/29/2006  (33254)  (1)
        ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  18:05:09 - 1/29/2006  (33255)  (1)
           ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  07:54:22 - 1/31/2006  (33271)  (1)
              ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - Cathryn  14:18:11 - 1/31/2006  (33274)  (1)
                 ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  16:30:41 - 1/31/2006  (33301)  (1)
                    ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  19:27:48 - 1/31/2006  (33302)  (1)
                       ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - marc / berkeley  07:57:48 - 2/1/2006  (33307)  (1)
                          ● Re: Ring Map>P-102 to 106 - glen  15:05:29 - 2/1/2006  (33311)  (0)