After my last post and your kind replies (Sorry to write in capitals Patbut i did it to make it easier for on to read the seperate comments by me and Dennis. Dennis and Canie i'm not negative towards prediction on the contrary thats what i do for a living. Unfortunately eartquake prediction involves the cooperation of many humans and many fields of science. In this page i only see posts from people that feel that their body is affected prior to the occurance of earthquakes. That is disapointing, i would like to see posts from people working with tides, ground temperature and radon gas emmision observations, animal behaviour and others, get my point ? We could all be one step further than now. Because now we dont know who to trust in here because after all when human lifes are involve it stops being a game or a hobby. Why doesnt Antonio answer for himself ? After 20 years of observations can he tell us which big (M>5) Greek events he had predicted in the past ?
This is because he claims that Greece and Turkey are in his "sensitive" zone and that is the reason i watch his predictions. When i see one about Greece-Turkey for the last 10 days in June ,as he has posted , i get worried get my drift. And when i test his ongoing predictions i see that he fails to convince me regarding his true "sensitivity". In the last weeks we had 2 events in the magnitude 6 range and several M=5 eqkes in the SE Medditeranean and Antonio has been silent. Maybe its better that way until we can show that there is some success rate better than 50% in predicting magnitude 2.5-4 earthquakes in a region where there is microseismic activity as he is doing or maybe the microseismic activity could really "influence" his body. How did he feel before the Irpinia Earthquake or the huge Etna eruption last week ! These are some of the questions that i have and i hope Antonio brakes his silence.