|
Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying |
Shan, As for your prediction here, Lat: 33.15N - Long: 137.04E -- does your 3 degree range mean that you are indicating a rectangle 36.15N, 30.15N, 140.04E, 134.04E? Just wondering if I got the range of your prediction for 6-7M quake correct. I'm inside that rectangle, so I am sure you can imagine my concern. Personally, I would not be surprised at two >6M quakes in this rectangle. My own prediction is for another >7 near Tokyo before the year is out. We currently have more than 1600 quakes a month in my immediate vicinity. Too bad you are unwilling to tell the world what your super-secret sun-shadow-calculations are. I would love to know how you calculate the whereabouts of a future 6M quake in Japan. Are you planning to carry your secret to your grave? Follow Ups: ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter 06:23:21 - 11/19/2005 (30716) (2) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Ara 20:15:20 - 11/19/2005 (30750) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter 21:10:15 - 11/19/2005 (30753) (0) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - glen 12:52:46 - 11/19/2005 (30734) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter 13:54:23 - 11/19/2005 (30735) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - glen 16:39:12 - 11/19/2005 (30737) (2) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter 17:03:52 - 11/19/2005 (30740) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - glen 18:16:26 - 11/19/2005 (30743) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter 18:40:41 - 11/19/2005 (30745) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Don in Hollister 18:54:14 - 11/19/2005 (30746) (1) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Roger Hunter 19:46:26 - 11/19/2005 (30749) (0) ● Re: Quakes in Japan shortly, goes w/o saying - Don in Hollister 16:59:38 - 11/19/2005 (30738) (0) |
|