|
|
|
|
| Re: disagree strongly - Likewise - Response Later n/t |
. Follow Ups: ● Continuing the Discussion - Petra 18:54:09 - 7/1/2005 (26772) (1) ● everyone's entitled to an opinion - John Vidale 22:36:35 - 7/1/2005 (26776) (1) ● Re: everyone's entitled to an opinion - Petra 01:18:51 - 7/2/2005 (26777) (1) ● you missed my point - John Vidale 07:23:25 - 7/2/2005 (26779) (1) ● Re: you missed my point - not really - Petra 09:48:32 - 7/2/2005 (26781) (2) ● makes sense - John Vidale 10:31:47 - 7/2/2005 (26783) (0) ● If I may intrude - Roger Hunter 10:08:04 - 7/2/2005 (26782) (2) ● Re: If I may intrude - Of Course - Petra 20:33:33 - 7/2/2005 (26791) (0) ● OT: Roger, check my "Ask Jim" post - John Vidale 11:56:17 - 7/2/2005 (26786) (1) ● Re: OT: Roger, check my "Ask Jim" post - Roger Hunter 12:17:12 - 7/2/2005 (26787) (1) ● then why didn't he deny it? - John Vidale 13:02:14 - 7/2/2005 (26788) (2) ● For the record, he denied it eventually - John Vidale 07:20:03 - 7/3/2005 (26794) (1) ● Re: For the record, he denied it eventually - Canie 20:31:44 - 7/5/2005 (26823) (1) ● intriguing stuff - John Vidale 09:25:49 - 7/7/2005 (26843) (0) ● Re: then why didn't he deny it? - Roger Hunter 13:29:14 - 7/2/2005 (26789) (1) ● Re: then why didn't he deny it? - Petra 14:35:44 - 7/2/2005 (26790) (1) ● I'd like to see Berklund's Loma Prieta prediction word- for word - chris in suburbia 14:27:55 - 7/6/2005 (26827) (1) ● So would I. - Roger Hunter 16:45:43 - 7/6/2005 (26831) (0) |
|
|
|
|
