|
Re: everyone's entitled to an opinion |
John, I'm rather disappointed in your response. I was hoping you would have answered some of my questions. There will always be more questions than answers or perhaps there are no answers or no easy one's. You cannot succeed if you do not try and those who wish to try cannot succeed if the opportunity for them to try is not afforded. Sometimes the atmosphere is not conducive and in that there are most likely a few good people who may have the answers and never try out of shear fear of being labeled in such a way that they dare not go there. I'm sorry things are that way, but they are. I'm not sure you could live with something that arrives round, rather than square, but if the future of earthquake victims relies on round, then we should have round. Petra Follow Ups: ● you missed my point - John Vidale 07:23:25 - 7/2/2005 (26779) (1) ● Re: you missed my point - not really - Petra 09:48:32 - 7/2/2005 (26781) (2) ● makes sense - John Vidale 10:31:47 - 7/2/2005 (26783) (0) ● If I may intrude - Roger Hunter 10:08:04 - 7/2/2005 (26782) (2) ● Re: If I may intrude - Of Course - Petra 20:33:33 - 7/2/2005 (26791) (0) ● OT: Roger, check my "Ask Jim" post - John Vidale 11:56:17 - 7/2/2005 (26786) (1) ● Re: OT: Roger, check my "Ask Jim" post - Roger Hunter 12:17:12 - 7/2/2005 (26787) (1) ● then why didn't he deny it? - John Vidale 13:02:14 - 7/2/2005 (26788) (2) ● For the record, he denied it eventually - John Vidale 07:20:03 - 7/3/2005 (26794) (1) ● Re: For the record, he denied it eventually - Canie 20:31:44 - 7/5/2005 (26823) (1) ● intriguing stuff - John Vidale 09:25:49 - 7/7/2005 (26843) (0) ● Re: then why didn't he deny it? - Roger Hunter 13:29:14 - 7/2/2005 (26789) (1) ● Re: then why didn't he deny it? - Petra 14:35:44 - 7/2/2005 (26790) (1) ● I'd like to see Berklund's Loma Prieta prediction word- for word - chris in suburbia 14:27:55 - 7/6/2005 (26827) (1) ● So would I. - Roger Hunter 16:45:43 - 7/6/2005 (26831) (0) |
|