|
Re: For the record, he denied it eventually |
And that's why we have a somewhat secure one here... I try to not ever say 'bad' things about Berkland's predictions - but my opinion of them is not high.. He's got the same basic prediction every month - sometimes 2x a month - one for each full or new moon... and then when one hits... its' a 'hit'... I think there is some statistical evidence around saying that there might be a bit more quakes during those times, but it's not enough to be statistically important. It just seems if you have 50% or better of the days covered for quakes in the most active tectonic areas, then you'll get hits... Canie Follow Ups: ● intriguing stuff - John Vidale 09:25:49 - 7/7/2005 (26843) (0) |
|