diversion?
Posted by John Vidale on November 21, 2003 at 19:16:08:

E,

If you consider who's doing it and whether it works a diversion, this discussion is not going to be fruitful. There are no statistics on your site that I could see. Maybe you can more clearly identify the statistical arguments.

J

Follow Ups:
     ● Statistics - EQF  22:25:36 - 11/21/2003  (20213)  (5)
        ● Responses – Important question answered – Workshop needed - EQF  22:26:37 - 11/22/2003  (20241)  (2)
           ● Re: Responses – Important question answered – Workshop needed - chris in suburbia  13:33:36 - 11/23/2003  (20248)  (1)
              ● Re: Responses – Important question answered – Workshop needed - EQF  18:15:38 - 11/23/2003  (20257)  (1)
                 ● electron storm - chris in suburbia  08:37:52 - 11/24/2003  (20263)  (1)
                    ● Re: electron storm - EQF  18:29:35 - 11/24/2003  (20269)  (0)
           ● out of patience - John Vidale  06:34:01 - 11/23/2003  (20246)  (1)
              ● Re: out of patience - EQF  18:18:22 - 11/23/2003  (20258)  (0)
        ● Re: Statistics - Don in Hollister  08:46:30 - 11/22/2003  (20223)  (1)
           ● Expected earthquake(s) - EQF  22:59:16 - 11/22/2003  (20244)  (0)
        ● some well-known math and physics - John Vidale  07:24:01 - 11/22/2003  (20221)  (0)
        ● Re: Statistics - Roger Hunter  06:30:22 - 11/22/2003  (20219)  (0)
        ● Re: Statistics - chris in suburbia  05:45:07 - 11/22/2003  (20217)  (1)
           ● oops - chris in suburbia  06:52:18 - 11/22/2003  (20220)  (1)
              ● Re: oops - Canie  10:17:01 - 11/22/2003  (20224)  (1)
                 ● that's the one - chris in suburbia  16:50:33 - 11/22/2003  (20228)  (0)
     ● Re: diversion? - Canie  19:50:29 - 11/21/2003  (20207)  (1)
        ● Wave Charts - EQF  22:57:57 - 11/21/2003  (20215)  (0)