Re: Debating - Why It's Important
Posted by Canie on November 20, 2003 at 23:00:54:

Petra - your comments about EQF have NOTHING in common with the great research on Nature Debates. They are demeaning and spiteful.

I suggested that you might just type up your standard response to ANYTHING EQF might say and publish it on your web site. Then you can simply post a link after anything that EQF posts - Then I don't have to keep reading the same thing over and over again.

I GOT YOUR POINT - ITS BEEN MADE. NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE.

I don't have to read it over and over and over and over and over and over ..... If you had something else to add to the DEBATE - then it might become worthwhile to read it. But you haven't said anything new in reference to EQF since the first time you posted about him... enough is enough. You just have no new thoughts to add about EQF - I think the whole world knows what your feelings about him are.

Please feel free to make contributions to this board on any other subject - you do have good thoughts to add and are capable of being a truly generous being - and if it bothers you - to not be able to put down another human being - then please don't bother posting.

Canie


Follow Ups:
     ● repetitive but eminently sensible - John Vidale  07:13:15 - 11/21/2003  (20175)  (1)
        ● Re: repetitive but eminently sensible - Canie  08:21:45 - 11/21/2003  (20176)  (4)
           ● Re: repetitive but eminently sensible - Petra Nova Challus  17:11:17 - 11/21/2003  (20202)  (1)
              ● Re: repetitive but eminently sensible - Canie  19:30:00 - 11/21/2003  (20206)  (0)
           ● Making things unnecessarily complicated - EQF  12:54:16 - 11/21/2003  (20189)  (1)
              ● talking in circles - John Vidale  13:48:17 - 11/21/2003  (20193)  (2)
                 ● Re: talking in circles - Cathryn  22:52:04 - 11/21/2003  (20214)  (1)
                    ● biweekly tides - John Vidale  07:30:31 - 11/22/2003  (20222)  (1)
                       ● Re: biweekly tides - Cathryn  16:58:56 - 11/22/2003  (20229)  (2)
                          ● Re: biweekly tides - Cathryn  17:14:30 - 11/23/2003  (20253)  (1)
                             ● eclipses - John Vidale  17:19:36 - 11/23/2003  (20254)  (1)
                                ● Re: eclipses - Canie  20:54:41 - 11/23/2003  (20259)  (0)
                          ● biweekly tides - John Vidale  06:14:40 - 11/23/2003  (20245)  (0)
                 ● No. You are simply not listening. - EQF  14:55:33 - 11/21/2003  (20196)  (2)
                    ● I'm losing my patience - John Vidale  15:47:53 - 11/21/2003  (20198)  (1)
                       ● Re: I'm losing my patience - EQF  17:19:31 - 11/21/2003  (20203)  (0)
                    ● That was supposed to be - Perhaps you are simply not listening n/t - EQF  14:58:53 - 11/21/2003  (20197)  (0)
           ● Re: repetitive but eminently sensible - Don in Hollister  10:36:03 - 11/21/2003  (20188)  (1)
              ● Re: repetitive but eminently sensible - Cathryn  12:55:01 - 11/21/2003  (20190)  (1)
                 ● Re: repetitive but eminently sensible - Canie  16:01:38 - 11/21/2003  (20200)  (1)
                    ● Amen! (NT) - Cathryn  21:41:16 - 11/21/2003  (20210)  (0)
           ● politics vs practicality - John Vidale  09:16:49 - 11/21/2003  (20177)  (0)