technical but has info
Posted by John Vidale on February 22, 2003 at 07:17:38:

A few years old now.

John

Follow Ups:
     ● Wow - that was quick - Tony  07:21:48 - 2/22/2003  (18112)  (1)
        ● oops, you meant foreshocks, not previous cycles - John Vidale  16:22:26 - 2/22/2003  (18116)  (1)
           ● the link - John Vidale  16:28:09 - 2/22/2003  (18117)  (1)
              ● Very cool paper -  - Tony  20:30:01 - 2/22/2003  (18118)  (1)
                 ● rule of thumb for the next quake - John Vidale  20:40:48 - 2/22/2003  (18120)  (0)