oops, you meant foreshocks, not previous cycles
Posted by John Vidale on February 22, 2003 at 16:22:26:

Tony,

I guess I read poorly too early in the morning.

John

Follow Ups:
     ● the link - John Vidale  16:28:09 - 2/22/2003  (18117)  (1)
        ● Very cool paper -  - Tony  20:30:01 - 2/22/2003  (18118)  (1)
           ● rule of thumb for the next quake - John Vidale  20:40:48 - 2/22/2003  (18120)  (0)