Re: A note to Mitch Battros
Posted by EQF on January 05, 2003 at 01:16:09:

The next report in this series is just about finished. And it will probably be posted here and to a number of Internet Newsgroups on Monday.

It proposes that it might be about time for geophysicists around the world to begin making some important decisions regarding the directions in which certain parts of the earthquake forecasting picture should be moving.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - Don in Hollister  11:20:52 - 1/5/2003  (17715)  (1)
        ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - EQF  12:56:49 - 1/5/2003  (17716)  (1)
           ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - Don in Hollister  13:15:21 - 1/5/2003  (17717)  (1)
              ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - Don in Hollister  14:02:15 - 1/5/2003  (17718)  (2)
                 ● South America earthquake - EQF  10:23:50 - 1/7/2003  (17733)  (0)
                 ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - EQF  19:41:39 - 1/5/2003  (17719)  (1)
                    ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - Don in Hollister  20:31:15 - 1/5/2003  (17720)  (1)
                       ● Re: A note to Mitch Battros - EQF  23:14:53 - 1/5/2003  (17721)  (1)
                          ● Re: quake forecasting - Canie  07:54:22 - 1/6/2003  (17725)  (2)
                             ● Re: quake forecasting - EQF  10:11:49 - 1/7/2003  (17732)  (1)
                                ● Re: quake forecasting - Canie  16:25:17 - 1/7/2003  (17740)  (1)
                                   ● Quake forecasting on daily basis! - R.Shanmugasundaram  16:20:24 - 1/9/2003  (17763)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Quake forecasting on daily basis! - EQF  17:45:16 - 1/9/2003  (17766)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Quake forecasting on daily basis! - R.Shanmugasundaram  14:49:01 - 1/10/2003  (17774)  (0)
                             ● Re: quake forecasting - R.Shanmugasundaram  17:52:27 - 1/6/2003  (17730)  (0)