Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates
Posted by Mary C. on September 29, 2002 at 20:25:04:

Are researchers in other countries more interested in earthquake prediction than most in the U.S.? The link below discusses some current research projects in the Ukraine using satellites. Title of the report is:
> REMOTE SENSING AS A TOOL OF SEISMIC HAZARDS MONITORING
> V. Korepanov
> Lviv Centre of Institute of Space Research
> Lviv, Ukraine

The abstract portion of the report begins:
> The possibility of the detection of the seismic hazards precursors in the
> ionosphere is continuously discussed by the scientific community. Some
> experimental facts give realistic evidence of the ionospheric-lithospheric
> interaction existence provoked by the seismic activity.

(The link is to a .pdf file requiring Adobe Acrobat Viewer, but an html version can be reached from google.com.)



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - 2cents  20:35:22 - 9/30/2002  (16854)  (1)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Mary C.  21:33:25 - 9/30/2002  (16858)  (0)
     ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Petra Challus  22:11:41 - 9/29/2002  (16839)  (1)
        ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Roger Hunter  15:38:54 - 9/30/2002  (16848)  (1)
           ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus  18:20:04 - 9/30/2002  (16851)  (1)
              ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  20:04:20 - 9/30/2002  (16852)  (3)
                 ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus  21:18:28 - 9/30/2002  (16857)  (2)
                    ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  07:55:29 - 10/1/2002  (16864)  (1)
                       ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Petra Challus  18:58:43 - 10/1/2002  (16868)  (1)
                          ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Mary C.  20:47:12 - 10/1/2002  (16869)  (0)
                    ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:24:32 - 10/1/2002  (16860)  (0)
                 ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  20:57:44 - 9/30/2002  (16856)  (2)
                    ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:33:06 - 10/1/2002  (16861)  (1)
                       ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C.  05:53:33 - 10/1/2002  (16863)  (0)
                    ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - About Parkfield - Petra Challus  22:24:17 - 9/30/2002  (16859)  (0)
                 ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Don In Hollister  20:43:38 - 9/30/2002  (16855)  (1)
                    ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter  04:35:57 - 10/1/2002  (16862)  (0)