|
Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates |
Petra; The problem is largely financial liability. If I own property in the are YOU say will be destroyed in a quake then my property value goes to zero, my insurance gets cancelled and I suffer a big loss. Guess who gets sued as a result. YOU, that's who. Especially if you're wrong. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus 18:20:04 - 9/30/2002 (16851) (1) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter 20:04:20 - 9/30/2002 (16852) (3) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Petra Challus 21:18:28 - 9/30/2002 (16857) (2) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C. 07:55:29 - 10/1/2002 (16864) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Petra Challus 18:58:43 - 10/1/2002 (16868) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction Council & Psychological Studies - Mary C. 20:47:12 - 10/1/2002 (16869) (0) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter 04:24:32 - 10/1/2002 (16860) (0) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C. 20:57:44 - 9/30/2002 (16856) (2) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter 04:33:06 - 10/1/2002 (16861) (1) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Mary C. 05:53:33 - 10/1/2002 (16863) (0) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - About Parkfield - Petra Challus 22:24:17 - 9/30/2002 (16859) (0) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Don In Hollister 20:43:38 - 9/30/2002 (16855) (1) ● Re: Paradoxes - Nature's Debates - Right To Know - Roger Hunter 04:35:57 - 10/1/2002 (16862) (0) |
|