|
Re: Geomagnetic Storm |
Hi Canie: FYI, here's a related data link: http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ace/ All one needs to do is run a correlation check (program) on this data relative to the times of say Mag. 6.5 earthquakes. One may consider inserting various delay times into the earthquake times and then doing the correlation check...to investigate delay times from the event(s) (assuming the program used does not do this).
http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/secure/v8n3/weldon.cfm This study doesn't seem like a whole lot of work (providing the historical event data is readily available). It seems likely that maybe someone has already done this type of a study...(LW?).... $.02
Follow Ups: ● Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - EQF 18:02:46 - 5/12/2002 (15576) (3) ● Re: Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - EQF 17:55:09 - 5/13/2002 (15596) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - Roger Hunter 05:08:27 - 5/14/2002 (15622) (0) ● Re: Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - EQF 20:35:09 - 5/12/2002 (15581) (0) ● Re: Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - Say What? - Petra Challus 19:02:17 - 5/12/2002 (15579) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - Say What? - chris in suburbia 08:16:21 - 5/13/2002 (15590) (1) ● Re: Geomagnetic storm plus gravitational forces - Say What? - Canie 09:50:57 - 5/13/2002 (15592) (1) ● Re: How Soon We Forget - Petra Challus 18:32:49 - 5/13/2002 (15597) (1) ● Re: How Soon We Forget-?? - Canie 19:25:48 - 5/13/2002 (15599) (1) ● Re: How Soon We Forget-?? - Petra Challus 20:47:04 - 5/13/2002 (15601) (1) ● moving on - chris in suburbia 06:18:14 - 5/14/2002 (15625) (0) |
|