|
Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) |
Hi Lowell: Looks like the Anza and P.N.G. events are backwards to the usual routine, pretty curious. The lack of any sizable aftershock also makes me wonder if something bigger is yet to come. Has the FFA group done any research on the relationship on wave orientation with regards to fault orientation of the triggered FFA events? Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell 16:47:13 - 11/3/2001 (10664) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter 11:56:04 - 10/31/2001 (10542) (1) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - michael 15:46:39 - 10/31/2001 (10553) (3) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell 16:49:43 - 11/3/2001 (10665) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter 19:03:36 - 10/31/2001 (10558) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Don In Hollister 16:19:42 - 10/31/2001 (10556) (1) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - michael 12:15:21 - 11/1/2001 (10571) (2) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Lowell 16:52:48 - 11/3/2001 (10666) (0) ● Re: Far Field Aftershock Forecast from New Britain (10-31-01) - Roger Hunter 12:31:33 - 11/1/2001 (10573) (0) |
|