Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better
Posted by Skywise on October 26, 2013 at 16:30:23:

Didn't you make your list by going through all his past messages?

Maybe he doesn't realize how many there are?

But, I'm concerned about your example that ends up as two predictions. The context of how it was written may be important. Is it possible that it meant one 3-day window centered on midnight on the night of the 12th/morning of the 13th?

Anyway, for the predictors, this is why it is necessary to be CLEAR what the prediction is. It does you no justice to make vague descriptions that can be argued over what was really meant.

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Roger Hunter  00:36:59 - 10/27/2013  (101181)  (1)
        ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit  03:53:37 - 10/27/2013  (101182)  (1)
           ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise  04:39:56 - 10/27/2013  (101183)  (1)
              ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit  06:53:20 - 10/27/2013  (101184)  (1)
                 ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Roger Hunter  09:05:19 - 10/27/2013  (101185)  (1)
                    ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit  10:44:35 - 10/27/2013  (101186)  (2)
                       ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise  16:30:29 - 10/27/2013  (101189)  (0)
                       ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter  14:27:06 - 10/27/2013  (101188)  (1)
                          ● Re: File requested - Amit  22:48:00 - 10/27/2013  (101192)  (1)
                             ● Re: File requested - Amit  10:31:30 - 10/28/2013  (101194)  (1)
                                ● Re: File requested - Amit  10:51:00 - 10/28/2013  (101195)  (1)
                                   ● Re: File requested - Amit  12:30:11 - 10/28/2013  (101196)  (1)
                                      ● Re: File requested - Amit  12:41:16 - 10/28/2013  (101197)  (1)
                                         ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter  13:37:38 - 10/28/2013  (101198)  (1)
                                            ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter  15:27:47 - 10/28/2013  (101199)  (0)