|
Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better |
Didn't you make your list by going through all his past messages? Maybe he doesn't realize how many there are? But, I'm concerned about your example that ends up as two predictions. The context of how it was written may be important. Is it possible that it meant one 3-day window centered on midnight on the night of the 12th/morning of the 13th? Anyway, for the predictors, this is why it is necessary to be CLEAR what the prediction is. It does you no justice to make vague descriptions that can be argued over what was really meant. Brian Follow Ups: ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Roger Hunter 00:36:59 - 10/27/2013 (101181) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit 03:53:37 - 10/27/2013 (101182) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise 04:39:56 - 10/27/2013 (101183) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit 06:53:20 - 10/27/2013 (101184) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Roger Hunter 09:05:19 - 10/27/2013 (101185) (1) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Amit 10:44:35 - 10/27/2013 (101186) (2) ● Re: Yet another 6.5+ date hit; this should look better - Skywise 16:30:29 - 10/27/2013 (101189) (0) ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter 14:27:06 - 10/27/2013 (101188) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 22:48:00 - 10/27/2013 (101192) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 10:31:30 - 10/28/2013 (101194) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 10:51:00 - 10/28/2013 (101195) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 12:30:11 - 10/28/2013 (101196) (1) ● Re: File requested - Amit 12:41:16 - 10/28/2013 (101197) (1) ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter 13:37:38 - 10/28/2013 (101198) (1) ● Re: File requested - Roger Hunter 15:27:47 - 10/28/2013 (101199) (0) |
|